Poster Presentation International Positive Psychology Association 8th IPPA World Congress 2023

Hold me: A call for touch in positive psychology (#657)

Kimberly Dickman 1
  1. US Air Force, COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, United States

Background

 The empirical evidence of the incredible power of touch to both ameliorate the negative and to bolster the positive is undeniable. From Harlow’s monkeys to the Romanian orphans, the lack of touch is shown to impact the quality of life and the ability to live. Research on tactile therapy with premature babies has shown the potent impact of touch on growth, development, and connection. 

Aims

This poster proposes that touch be included in the science of applied positive psychology. Though there are factors such as sexual violence and contagious diseases that caution us from physically engaging with others we cannot allow these nuanced factors to stop us from investigating a potential arena for wellbeing, thriving, and living a good life. A call for future empirical research and positive interventions with touch 

Method

The physical, social, cognitive, and emotional impact of touch has been empirically documented. This presentation makes the connection between touch and wellbeing and challenges the field of positive psychology to explore this connection further. Challenging the field, recommended  ways forward are introduced in this poster. 

Results

 A call for future empirical research and positive interventions with touch is proposed which, if empirically supported, could lead to a new theory in the field of positive psychology. 

Conclusion

Positive psychology cannot shy away from touch because of the challenges it poses in our culture. Further research is needed in the field of touches impact on wellbeing. With scientific inquiry of positive interventions, new theories could impact both practice and science. 

  1. Blum, D. (2011). Love at Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection. Basic Books.
  2. Cacioppo, J. T. & Patrick, W. (2009). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. W. W. Norton & Company.
  3. Colton, H. (1983). The gift of touch. Seaview/Putnam.
  4. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 3, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001
  5. Field, T. (1994). The effects of mother’s physical and emotional unavailability on emotion regulation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2-3), 208- 227.
  6. Field, T. (1999). Preschoolers in America are touched less and are more aggressive than preschoolers in France. Child Development and Care, 151, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443991510102
  7. Field, T. (2003). Touch. Bradford Books.
  8. Field, T. (2010). Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30, 367-383.
  9. Linden, D. J. (2015). Touch: The Science of the Hand, Heart, and Mind. Penguin Books.
  • Please select up to 3 keywords from the following list to best describe your submission content: Biology, Life span development, Relationships