Background
Does acting courageously protect us from moral injury? Negative psychological effects stemming from exposure to a violation of what’s right (Shay, 1995) have been linked in a variety of occupations to a variety of negative outcomes, including PTSD, depression, anxiety, and suicidality (Amsalem et al., 2021; Hall et al., 2022; Shay, 1995; Sugrue, 2020). Potentially morally injurious experiences (PMIEs; Drescher et al., 2011) lead to moral injury when there is dissonance between one’s actions during the event compared to the belief that one is a moral person (Litz et al., 2009). Courageous actions involve taking a worthwhile risk (Pury & Saylors, 2017), with the worth often representing a morally good goal (e.g., Lopez et al., 2003; Lord, 1918).
Aims
We predict that participants describing a PMIE who tried to stop the event would rate those actions in a manner consistent with courage. Additionally, compared to participants who did not try to stop the event, those taking action would think about the PMIE it in a less negative and more positive way.
Method
We have preliminary results from 172 participants from a paid online sample. All participants were asked if they had ever experienced an event in an organization that violated their sense of right and wrong (a PMIE): 149 (87%) answered yes and were asked additional questions about the PMIE and any attempts they made to stop it. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (Boyd et al., 2022)
Results
Eighty two (55%) did something to try to stop the action or reduce the harm; 67 (45%) did not. Descriptions of actions taken to stop a PMIE are broadly consistent with the hallmarks of courageous action, and rating of courageousness correlates significantly with a more positive emotional tone when describing the PMIE.
Conclusion
Data collection is ongoing, but if our hypotheses are supported, we suggest that courageous resistance can mitigate the harm from PMIEs.